Children will be released from immigration detention.
When human-rights organisations react with devastation to the above statement,
you know something is very wrong.
You know that there’s a catch. In fact many catches.
You know that the Minister for Immigration and Border Protection
now has rights seemingly unfettered by the courts or international law.
You know that there are no protections for the children
written into the new laws.
You know that the next batch of children to arrive can be
put just about anywhere the Minister so deems to be appropriate. A developing
nation with no child protection legislation – based on past experience – would
be a good guess.
You know that the 167 children on Nauru will be no better
off.
You know that 28 children in the community on Nauru, living
in fear of their lives, hiding in their homes, will be no better off.
You fear now for the lives of 107 children born in Australia. They will quite possibly be put on a plane – as soon as it is
reasonably decent to do so – though the Minister’s definition of ‘decent’
evades you for this moment.
The legislation promises nothing in the way of child
protections.
The minister frees the children under the same laws he had
yesterday. And the week before that, and the year before that. Nothing has
changed in that regard.
The children will only be freed because he says they will be
freed.
This means they can be redetained at any time.
If found to be refugees they can be redetained. (The department forced 8-month pregnant refugee women
off a bus – allegedly turning off the air conditioning and overheating them out of the
vehicle – and back into detention, after they had lived freely for months.)
You’ll forgive us for not jumping up and down with glee when
the Minister says the children will be out by Christmas.
At what price this last minute dash to free the children, on
the last sitting day of parliament – after the government has been in power for
so long?
These children – detained on average 467 days – were all of
a sudden a priority?
Forgive us for not applauding.
For these children may temporarily be free. But in the long
term, child rights have been compromised, to the point where one man has the
power to flick them to a developing nation with the courts silenced. And
international law becomes a footnote in an Act already lacking a notion of child rights.
Postscript: Not 24 hours after he promised to release children a 6 month old baby is sent to Darwin on its way to Nauru to indefinite detention. Has this minister no shame? Nauru's mortality rate for children under five is 40 times that of Australia’s.
Postscript: Not 24 hours after he promised to release children a 6 month old baby is sent to Darwin on its way to Nauru to indefinite detention. Has this minister no shame? Nauru's mortality rate for children under five is 40 times that of Australia’s.